Before 1965 roughly 200,000
immigrants were approved annually to reside in the United States; largely to
pursue professional opportunities and/or to reunite with estranged family
members. Regardless of their circumstances, these individuals had to
demonstration a willingness to assimilate to our culture and provide for
themselves without harboring any undue animosity towards America. In fact,
applicants were required to demonstrate a working knowledge of our founding
ideals, government procedures and laws, in addition to formally pledging allegiance
to America while denying serving as a foreign spy or Communist agent. In
essence, citizenship was a privilege with firm requirements and stark
expectations. Not only were our immigration laws viewed as fundamental
necessities designed to protect America’s interests, her citizens and
sovereignty – yes, legislation written and ratified by both political parties -
they were routinely enforced without any organized protest, media outrage or
inflammatory rhetoric from duplicitous politicians plotting to grant Amnesty to
an additional 11 million Democratic voters. Immigration was universally
accepted as a matter of prudence, non-partisan pragmatism, not a destructive
platform to invalidate intellectual diversity through electoral supremacy.
Since 1970, but even more so
during the past 15 years, immigration has divulged into a chaotic dereliction
of duty that now accounts for over one million immigrants entering America each
year; a majority of which are illegal, unvetted, harbor almost no loyalty
towards America but somehow were awarded federal benefits, healthcare and
education at taxpayer expense. If this astronomical trend continues, 40%
of all children in the US will have come from foreign born parents by 2060. To
make matters worse, elected public servants who once swore to uphold our laws
and the Constitution itself, including one Barack Hussein Obama, have purposely
muddled an elementary issue of national security for political gain. “Hope and
Change” were obviously the misunderstood, monosyllabic cousins of “Confuse,
Conspire and Conquer”.
Despite the disturbing
reality illegal immigration costs America approximately 100 billion annually,
increases the prevalence of crime and threatens the integrity of our
elections through the auspices of voter fraud, sanctuary cities are actually
attempting to sue the Justice Department for upholding the law and doing their
job. Illegal aliens account for over 25 percent of the current U.S. Prison
population, with each inmate averaging 12 criminal offenses and 8 arrests for a
total incarceration cost of 7 billion taxpayer dollars per year...ironically
almost the same "unaffordable" price tag of building a border wall,
minus the cost of deporting repeat offenders. Yet by some unintelligible form
of "progressive" reasoning, our President is a radical supremacist
for specifically ordering the deportation of career criminals and violent gang
members who pose a threat and financial drain to all sects of society;
including other illegals, and both naturalized and natural born citizens?
Naturally!
Considering Los Angeles
alone has spent an estimate 1.6 billion in the past two years providing for and
shielding illegals, including offering driver’s licenses, tuition waivers and
free legal assistance to sue actual American citizens, bankrupt California is
the epitome of the detached bureaucracy attempting to dismantle America in
favor of a globalist socialist utopia that criminalizes common sense and seeks
to euthanize any concept of self-preservation; if you’re a patriotic, Christian
American with a job, a gun and an acute awareness of history, that is.
Under the Trump
administration’s new “RAISE” program, common sense will replace political chaos
and points will earn the privilege of residing in America. Immigrants seeking
work visas and/or citizenship will be given special preference according to
their job skills, knowledge of the English language, and willingness to
assimilate as productive, law-abiding members of society. In other words, the
reignited “Don’t ask what America can do for you, but what you can do for
America” creed of John F. Kennedy will help filter out those aspiring burdens
who are more concerned with handouts, exploiting both the system and struggling
taxpayers, than working towards the betterment and preservation of a free,
independent and economically vibrant nation. And yes, these reaffirmed goals of
naturalization will also help better identify those bitter transients who despise
America and have no regard for her people or survival. Unless burning the
American flag, cursing our heritage and attacking Amnesty opponents are now
acceptable behavior for foreign guests – smugly waving the symbol of their
native countries which so egregiously failed them – such unapologetic logic is
long overdue and sorely unappreciated.
The problem with enacting
policies rooted in reason, historical precedence, and beneficial to the U.S.,
is that progressives are bound to protest anything that makes too much
sense. Despite the knee-jerk “resistance” prescribed by Democrats, the liberal
commune of Canada utilizes a similar merit-based system and routinely denies or
delays migrants entrance into their country for both economic and security
reasons; despite Trudeau’s mindless proclamation “all refugees are welcome” to
assimilate naïve Westerns. Of course, you will hear no such admission by the
mainstream media for truth is not welcome in the production meetings of mass
manipulation. When buying cigarettes or applying for a loan requires more
screening and due deligence than stepping across the unguarded border of a
sovereign nation, in a post 9/11 world no less, the insane asylum has obviously
mastered the art of absentee voting.
If you thought Sitar music
was the annoying aftermath of lazy indigents attempting to become existentially
enlightened through hallucinogenic horticulture - the Marxist love child
of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren - the red Armies of Entitlement fed by
the wealth redistribution scheme of the Obama administration quietly doubled
our national debt by nearly 10 trillion and triggered the first two credit
downgrades in American History; an astounding figure nearly equaling the
accumulative debt accrued by all other Presidents combined. And to think
publicly funded abortions and sex changes, albeit for prisoners and
incarcerated illegals deported multiple times, are now being promoted as
natural born rights by social activists.
Whereas his predecessor
recklessly distributed over one million green cards each year, using them
primarily as a criminal means to help illegals escape deportation, Donald Trump
will limit that number to 5000,000 or less and require all approved immigrants
to wait at least 5 years before qualifying to apply for public assistance. If
you’re outraged by one man’s attempt to restore accountability and fiscal
responsibility to a politically hijacked matter of national security, but are
completely ambivalent towards the treasonous ploys of an anti-American
propagandist seeking to supplant our founding values and electoral balance
through an orchestrated demographic invasion, you definitely flunked Ethics and
hate your grandparents' powers of observation. How else can an American
Governor, bound by the state ratified supremacy of the Constitution and
subsject to the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice, refuse to release
election data when 11 of his counties cast more votes than citizens or legal
voting age?
When the argument is lost
and all credible options of opposition are exhausted, one word always remains
in the progressive pantheon of victimization: racism. Luckily for civilization,
outside the regurgitated excuses of the irrational mind where photo
identification is somehow the most unattainable form of pertinence but a
nonnegotiable necessity to attend the Democratic National Convention, lies the
single greatest manifestation of the real world: consequences. If a white
American stood in the heart Mexico City, demanded the right to vote and free
entitlements, all while waving the U.S. flag and cursing those Mexican “bigots”
who dared to disagree, how long would it be before he was beaten, jailed, or
buried? Would I be offered "sanctuary" for committing larceny,
assault or raping a Mexican child? No? How quaint. Apparently logic has a
passport with an undocumented carry-on of tuberculosis.
There are numerous cases of
Americans jailed in Central and South American countries for imaginary or
pedestrian infractions, corrupt nationals ransoming their life savings as
recompense for their reclaimed freedom, with almost no public outcry of
"racism" from those very critics demonizing our right to protect our
borders. Yes, it is true, a border wall will not stop all illegal immigration,
but such an ominous edifice, fortified by the public knowledge of our
recommitment to enforce our laws, will discourage and stop far more people than
it entices. I openly welcoming those individuals and families seeking a better
life by contributing to a moral and prosperous America, as long as they respect
the process and accept the inherent responsibility of becoming a citizen. I
simply refuse to provide the kindling for opportunistic malcontents who would
gladly watch America burn, bleed her dry behind the veil of political
correctness, before lifting a finger to act on her behalf. If thousands can
successfully immigrate from Asia, Europe and Australia without organizing a
single protest or demanding a billion dollar door prize, our contemporaries
South of the border shouldn't require need a translator to explain why houses
have locks and bank cards have pin numbers. Likewise, if the pompous Pope can
lecture America behind a 1167 year-old wall designed to repel pillaging
invaders, why can't America build one to weed out aspiring terrorists,
disgruntled anarchists and uninvited parasites?
No comments:
Post a Comment